top of page
Search
  • vmi_insider

The Cost of DEI


11 January 2023


SOVP is pleased to forward, in proud collegial support, a recent op-ed “The Hidden Costs of DEI” by Jefferson Council member Jim Bacon from his blog “Bacon’s Rebellion." In this piece, Jim outlines the specifics about the cost of DEI in Virginia’s public colleges and universities; a huge expense for a destructive purpose, according to a recent study conducted by The Virginia Association of Scholars (VAS).


SOVP was a co-sponsor of this enlightening study, with The Jefferson Council, which exposes the new cottage academia-industry that is Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. At UVA and JMU alone, a mere partial cost of DEI administration in 2021 grew 82%, to a sum of more than $12.2M. The total administrators employed increased from 71 to 142 that year, and the study concludes that this salary cost figure is but “…the tip of the iceberg.”


And what do the taxpayers of the Commonwealth receive for this massive, unknown total cost? In the words of Dr. Carol Swain PhD, they receive “… an indoctrination program where minorities are made to feel like victims and the white people are told how they are responsible for all of the sins of the world.”


Why does the Virginia State Legislature continue to appropriate money for this vile practice? And why do the state’s executive officials continue to sit idle and tolerate its implementation? SOVP will expend much time and energy in the New Year to expose and remove this cultural rot.

 


The Hidden Costs of DEI


by James A. Bacon


According to a new report by the Virginia Association of Scholars, the University of Virginia in 2021 employed 77 people as part of the a vast and growing Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) bureaucracy at a cost of nearly $7 million a year. Many questions arise from this revelation. What do all these people do? What are their goals? Are they improving the university climate? What is the effect of DEI on freedom of speech, inquiry and expression?


We will address these questions in future posts. For now, we want to make it clear that the $7 million cost is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.


The authors of the VAS study make it clear that they are counting only positions that are explicitly tied to DEI-related programs, and it counts only salaries. Not benefits. Not office overhead. Not outside consultants, speakers, or events. And perhaps most importantly, not the impact on faculty productivity.


The fixation on DEI suffuses every aspect of university life. Not only does the university administration have a DEI staff, not only do each of its 13 schools and colleges have DEI staffs, but the DEI ethic permeates down to the departmental level as reflected in planning sessions, training programs, departmental-level reading groups, the hiring of new employees, and the granting of pay raises, promotions, and tenure decision-making.


An extraordinary amount of activity at UVa is devoted to DEI, and that activity sucks faculty, students, and non-DEI staff into the vortex.


In UVa’s increasingly labyrinthine DEI bureaucracy, a group referred to as the Academic Deans and Directors for Diversity and Inclusion is described as “a core anchor” for diversity and inclusion at UVa. The group has its own web page. The following bullet points, pulled from that page, suggest what the deans are spending their time on:

  • strategic inclusive excellence planning;

  • key learning events and D&I programming for the University;

  • policy equity reviews;

  • building for a cultural climate of belonging;

  • student, staff, and faculty recruitment, retention, and success; and

  • institutional communications focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

Lots of planning. Lots of initiatives. Lots of meetings. Lots of networking. Lots of dialogue. Lots of communication. Lots of equity audits. Lots of memos and emails and updates and reports. In other words, endless bureaucratic thumb- sucking. Of course, all of this activity requires “collaboration” with faculty, who do things like actual teaching and research, and places demands on their time.


What the VAS study could not do is determine how much time non-DEI faculty and staff consume engaging in DEI activities. How does one even begin to measure the “trickle down” effects of the DEI mandate?


With bland bureaucratic language, the College of Arts & Sciences (A&S) website (my bold) provides a glimpse:


Diversity is critical for A&S in its pursuit of excellence, and our goal is to embed diversity considerations across the mission areas of the school. This approach is being used in the development of recommendations, initiatives, and strategies that will support and enhance diversity and inclusion across A&S.


And the School of Architecture:


Through the coordinated efforts of leadership, faculty, staff, students, alumni and allies, the School of Architecture is committed to the long term project of working together to build, promote and sustain a culture of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion — and to cultivate shared humanity through difference — within and beyond the University.


And the McIntire School of Commerce, from its Inclusive Excellence Plan 2021:


This collaborative plan outlines a series of goals and initiatives aimed at organizational change to address diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), as critical to achieving excellence at McIntire. These goals were developed through a collaborative process overseen by the McIntire Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (ODEI) involving students, faculty and staff which began in the Fall of 2019. This process has primarily been conducted through engagement and ongoing review with McIntire’s Diversity Advisory Committee.


And the University of Virginia Library:


We work closely with the offices of the Provost, Vice President & Chief Diversity Officer, and African-American Affairs to be educated by speakers and consultants who research and study racism.


My point in this post is not to critique the substance of the DEI philosophy as practiced at UVA or question whether DEI even accomplishes the goals it sets for itself — we will save those matters for other posts — but to suggest that DEI has become a Maoist-like perpetual struggle that engages everyone at a significant cost to productivity.


There is no indication that anyone has catalogued the direct costs of the DEI bureaucracy that has exploded on President Jim Ryan’s watch, must less the indirect costs such as those described above. It’s time UVa stakeholders — including parents, students, taxpayers and alumni — ask those questions, demand answers and then weigh the costs against the putative benefits.


———————————————————-


Founded in 2021, the Spirit of VMI PAC is a registered Virginia Political Action Committee whose purpose is to preserve VMI’s reputation as an elite leadership institution


Point of Contact:

SOVP Communications Staff: info@thespiritofvmi.org

Visit the SOVP website: https://thespiritofvmi.org



# # # #


635 views1 comment

Recent Posts

See All

The VMI Class of 2025's Elephant in the Room

Reprinted with permission of The Cadet. The Cadet is not affiliated with The Spirit of VMI Political Action Committee and remains one of the oldest independent student newspapers in Virginia. Access t

Chairman's Update

22 March 2024 Welcome to the Winter 2024 newsletter for The Spirit of VMI (PAC), The Sentinel. Thank you for caring enough to be curious and curious enough to act. In this issue of The Sentinel, we ha

VMI Eschews Standards of Excellence, Devalues Diploma

As an alumnus living in Florida, I have a dearth of information about what is happening at the Virginia Military Institute on a day-to-day basis. I see the superficial social media postings from the p

1 комментарий


jminch2011
11 янв. 2023 г.

This is a fair inquiry as to the goals and objectives of a program that is receiving such a substantial investment of funding. Bravo and well played for initiating this study. This is what a fair fight looks like.


These expenditures are literally the staffing associated with a new academic major or department.


This is one of the fact-based channels of inquiry that should be pursued in a calm and reasonable manner. What are the deliverables, at what cost, and how are they measured? In a debate that at times competes for the most inane utterances, this is perfectly fair and reasonable.


The inquiry should be expanded to include every aspect of cost. Sunlight.


Well played.


JLM '73

www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com

Лайк
bottom of page